Table of Contents
Never had an engine problem. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply seemed like a diesel.
I wonder exactly how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time leaving it's own way ... the 300i6 would certainly do everything I need this truck to do patgizz composed: 3 things in the automotive globe refuse to break.
those should be held as the criteria to which every little thing else is determined. Virtually every little thing else pales in contrast. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based upon the chevy stovebolt 6 naturally) Wow, because of the outpour of praise, it looked excellent so I purchased it, right here's the advertisement lmk what you people think Oops, didn't imply to be cryptic, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was practically a 4.9 l.
first order of biz though, I'm fairly huge, and the guiding wheel to seat is relatively narrow ... guy that wheel cover was not ribbed for my pleasure:-LRB- The only problem I have actually ever seen with trucks like that, are damaged shifters. Ford made them a little as well difficult and they would certainly break right at the floorboard.
Remember the gas mileage won't be the most effective on the planet, yet it will damn sure run for life. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I always had a lot of area in the cab of them. wbjones wrote: Brian created: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never ever had an engine concern.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply appeared like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 combined, 20 freeway with the OD5. I wonder how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time getting out of it's own way ... The engine bay wasn't developed for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One container remove an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, but it sucks. Mod electric motors require ahead out laterally and you need to draw the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core support does not unbolt like in F250s and later on F150s.
WonkoTheSane composed: spitfirebill composed: In respond to HappyAndy: Thanks Captain Obvious What did he state to warrant this? I'm really interested. I really did not see anything in his reply that would certainly require this response. "They are usually reputable as gravity as long as they aren't sludged up" What engine enjoys sludge? Knurled composed: wbjones wrote: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 vehicle.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply appeared like a diesel. I ask yourself how hard a swap it would be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Very extremely confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek blog post, that I didn't explain ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I added that point due to the fact that when I needed to find a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go via each in every junkyard in South Jersey to discover one that had not been sludged up actually terribly.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to discuss a few issues of these vans, yet I I'm plainly not going to appear and state one is much better than the various other. If that's what you're looking for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are a few of the differences in between these 2 brands? Bernie: Well, they're basically the exact same lorry.
They seem to be a bit a lot more used in that area, however, you understand, those are a few of the usages, but they're basically the exact same category of vehicle. Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines then. What concerns do you see in between these two automobiles? Bernie: Yeah. So let's speak about engine and really simply to define that the version years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you understand, I imply, these vans have been around for a long period of time.
And, you understand, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around given that, you know, around that time as well. Considering that 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a whole lot of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with impact to these engines, because they didn't have sufficient threading in the spark plug, which caused issues.
Really really cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek message, that I didn't explain ... my bad In respond to spitfirebill: I included that factor because when I needed to discover a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go via each in every junkyard in South Jersey to discover one that had not been sludged up actually badly.
Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're going to talk regarding a few concerns of these vans, yet I I'm clearly not going to come out and say one is far better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're basically the same automobile.
They seem to be a little bit a lot more made use of in that area, yet, you recognize, those are a few of the uses, but they're basically the same classification of automobile. Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines then. What issues do you see in between these two cars? Bernie: Yeah. Allow's chat concerning engine and in fact simply to specify that the design years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you know, I mean, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you recognize, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around considering that, you understand, around that time too. We're not going to obtain back into, into the earlier stuff. Considering that 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are far more popular and I would not really recommend a V6 engine.
There's a whole lot of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with strike to these engines, because they really did not have sufficient threading in the stimulate plug, which created issues.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Is the Ford F150 the top car? (Our Review in El Paso)
Is the Ford F150 the ultimate truck?
Is the Ford e150 the best truck?